Google endorses Clean Power Plan ahead of expected repeal – TechCrunch

GreenTech

Google has joined Apple in a growing chorus of tech giants coming out in support of the Clean Power Plan. The company filed a statement with the Environmental Protection Agency, which it has since shared with TechCrunch, supporting the Obama-era legislation.

The legislation, which sought to curb power plant emissions by more than 30 percent by 2030, is expected to be repealed by the Trump administration. As with Apple’s earlier filing, Google cites both environmental and economic fallout, should the policy be repealed.

“Wind and solar deployment—as well as the associated supply chains—have been among the fastest-growing sectors of the U.S. economy in recent years,” the company writes in the letter dated April 25, “with job growth rates significantly exceeding the growth rate of the overall labor force.”

The company also notes its own personal interest in supporting the policy, citing its work to shift toward renewable energy, along with the CPP’s potential to drive job growth. “The Clean Power Plan can continue to drive innovation and job growth,” Google adds, “while spurring the modernization of the American electricity system and reducing carbon dioxide emissions and helping to mitigate the threat of global climate change.

Under embattled head Scott Pruitt, the EPA has suggested that the CPP was an illegal extension of the agency’s authority. Late last month, Trump signed an executive order mandating a review of the policy, a move most observers have interpreted as the first steps toward its eventual repeal.

Source

Articles You May Like

TravelPerk grabs $44M to take its pain-free SaaS for business travel global – TechCrunch
U.S. lawmakers warn Canada to keep Huawei out of its 5G plans – TechCrunch
Pocket’s reading app won’t sound so robotic now – TechCrunch
Here’s how to find out if your Facebook was hacked in the breach – TechCrunch
Snowflake scoops up another blizzard of cash with $450 million round – TechCrunch

Leave a Reply